<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.7" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Making of an NFL Roster</title>
	<link>http://www.oscargamblesociety.com/making-of-an-nfl-roster/</link>
	<description>People don't think it be like it is, but it do.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.7</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Cliffy</title>
		<link>http://www.oscargamblesociety.com/making-of-an-nfl-roster/#comment-839</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 22:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oscargamblesociety.com/making-of-an-nfl-roster/#comment-839</guid>
					<description>What the hell does future potential have to do with present Super Bowl?  A team doesn't win a Super Bowl based on what their QB might/will do in the *future*.  They win (in Danny's theory) based on what they did *now* - in *this* game.

And to the point, Dilfer has as many Super Bowl rings as Peyton and Big Ben - and he performed as well as Peyton (in their respective SB wins), and way better than Big Ben did in his SB win.  That's the point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What the hell does future potential have to do with present Super Bowl?  A team doesn&#8217;t win a Super Bowl based on what their QB might/will do in the *future*.  They win (in Danny&#8217;s theory) based on what they did *now* - in *this* game.</p>
<p>And to the point, Dilfer has as many Super Bowl rings as Peyton and Big Ben - and he performed as well as Peyton (in their respective SB wins), and way better than Big Ben did in his SB win.  That&#8217;s the point.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Gonzo</title>
		<link>http://www.oscargamblesociety.com/making-of-an-nfl-roster/#comment-838</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 21:04:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oscargamblesociety.com/making-of-an-nfl-roster/#comment-838</guid>
					<description>I should know better than to try to speak for Danny, but:

Maybe he means a team needs to have a QB whose career potential is better than "servicable"?  Yes, Petyon was mediocre during his win, and Ben was flat out awful in his, but I think it's fair to say both those guys have MUCH more  upside than Dilfer ever had, even in his wet dreams...  

Point being, Peyton (duh) and Ben COULD make a big play potentially in their next SB appearance.  Dilfer?  Not so much...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should know better than to try to speak for Danny, but:</p>
<p>Maybe he means a team needs to have a QB whose career potential is better than &#8220;servicable&#8221;?  Yes, Petyon was mediocre during his win, and Ben was flat out awful in his, but I think it&#8217;s fair to say both those guys have MUCH more  upside than Dilfer ever had, even in his wet dreams&#8230;  </p>
<p>Point being, Peyton (duh) and Ben COULD make a big play potentially in their next SB appearance.  Dilfer?  Not so much&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Cliffy</title>
		<link>http://www.oscargamblesociety.com/making-of-an-nfl-roster/#comment-822</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 17:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oscargamblesociety.com/making-of-an-nfl-roster/#comment-822</guid>
					<description>You ignorant sluts.

"I think we are beyond the point where a “serviceable” QB like Trent Dilfer could win a Super Bowl in today’s game.  I don’t care how good your defense is, if the QB can’t make some game changing plays on his own, there is no Super Bowl victory dance. "

What do you call Ben Roethlisberger from two years ago?  Hell, he was *less* than serviceable and the Steelers won that game.  He had the fourth *worst* passer rating in Super Bowl *history* (22.6) - and his team won.

And just last year... Peyton Manning is an all-time great QB who will retire to the discussion/debate of being *the* greatest of all-time.  But look at his performance last year... it was decidedly Dilfer-like!  Their passer ratings in Super Bowl-winning performances: Dilfer (80.9), Peyton (81.8).  The Colts didn't win last year cuz Peyton played like Peyton - they won (in part) cuz Peyton played like Dilfer.  Peyton was the MVP - but it was more of a career achievement award and a nod towards "Hey, big guy, you finally broke through.".  His MVP award had *nothing* to do with his performance in that specific game - the co-MVPs should've been Rhodes and Addai, unless you wanted to give it to someone on defense (Bob Sanders, most likely)... you know, the performances that *actually* made the difference in that game.

What the last two Super Bowls have showed us - glaringly - is that you need a stifling defense (and an opponent with a terrible offense doesn't hurt in that regard)... and just a QB that doesn't give the game away.

Have you not been paying attention - or are you still a bit loopy over Va Tech's improbable ACC Chamionship victory over the superior BC Eagles?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You ignorant sluts.</p>
<p>&#8220;I think we are beyond the point where a “serviceable” QB like Trent Dilfer could win a Super Bowl in today’s game.  I don’t care how good your defense is, if the QB can’t make some game changing plays on his own, there is no Super Bowl victory dance. &#8221;</p>
<p>What do you call Ben Roethlisberger from two years ago?  Hell, he was *less* than serviceable and the Steelers won that game.  He had the fourth *worst* passer rating in Super Bowl *history* (22.6) - and his team won.</p>
<p>And just last year&#8230; Peyton Manning is an all-time great QB who will retire to the discussion/debate of being *the* greatest of all-time.  But look at his performance last year&#8230; it was decidedly Dilfer-like!  Their passer ratings in Super Bowl-winning performances: Dilfer (80.9), Peyton (81.8).  The Colts didn&#8217;t win last year cuz Peyton played like Peyton - they won (in part) cuz Peyton played like Dilfer.  Peyton was the MVP - but it was more of a career achievement award and a nod towards &#8220;Hey, big guy, you finally broke through.&#8221;.  His MVP award had *nothing* to do with his performance in that specific game - the co-MVPs should&#8217;ve been Rhodes and Addai, unless you wanted to give it to someone on defense (Bob Sanders, most likely)&#8230; you know, the performances that *actually* made the difference in that game.</p>
<p>What the last two Super Bowls have showed us - glaringly - is that you need a stifling defense (and an opponent with a terrible offense doesn&#8217;t hurt in that regard)&#8230; and just a QB that doesn&#8217;t give the game away.</p>
<p>Have you not been paying attention - or are you still a bit loopy over Va Tech&#8217;s improbable ACC Chamionship victory over the superior BC Eagles?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Gonzo</title>
		<link>http://www.oscargamblesociety.com/making-of-an-nfl-roster/#comment-816</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 22:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oscargamblesociety.com/making-of-an-nfl-roster/#comment-816</guid>
					<description>Agree with all, except #4.  IMO, a Ray Lewis type middle linebacker OR a Shawn Merriman on the outside is more important - with a front 7 like that, you don't need shutdown corners, since the QB won't have much time to throw...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree with all, except #4.  IMO, a Ray Lewis type middle linebacker OR a Shawn Merriman on the outside is more important - with a front 7 like that, you don&#8217;t need shutdown corners, since the QB won&#8217;t have much time to throw&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

