Comments on: Maybe it is not only ESPN http://www.oscargamblesociety.com/maybe-it-is-not-only-espn/ People don't think it be like it is, but it do. Sun, 20 May 2012 08:06:38 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.7 by: Cliffy http://www.oscargamblesociety.com/maybe-it-is-not-only-espn/#comment-1674 Sun, 03 May 2009 14:36:40 +0000 http://www.oscargamblesociety.com/maybe-it-is-not-only-espn/#comment-1674 Danny, you'll be happy to know there it was discussed in today's Globe - specifically a one-line mention in the bottom corner of the Baseball page... but as expected, it was a Brewer. So again, I ask... if a Brewer accomplishs something noteworthy, did it really happen (or more accurately, do we really care)? Fwiw, the Globe piece says it was the fourth time it's been done - though they failed to specify the previous three. Danny, you’ll be happy to know there it was discussed in today’s Globe - specifically a one-line mention in the bottom corner of the Baseball page… but as expected, it was a Brewer. So again, I ask… if a Brewer accomplishs something noteworthy, did it really happen (or more accurately, do we really care)?

Fwiw, the Globe piece says it was the fourth time it’s been done - though they failed to specify the previous three.

]]> by: Cliffy http://www.oscargamblesociety.com/maybe-it-is-not-only-espn/#comment-1669 Fri, 01 May 2009 16:57:26 +0000 http://www.oscargamblesociety.com/maybe-it-is-not-only-espn/#comment-1669 Was it a Brewer? If so, that explains it... don't you think? Was it a Brewer? If so, that explains it… don’t you think?

]]>