Comments on: MLB over/under for team wins http://www.oscargamblesociety.com/mlb-overunder-for-team-wins/ People don't think it be like it is, but it do. Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:22:41 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.7 by: Gonzo http://www.oscargamblesociety.com/mlb-overunder-for-team-wins/#comment-1650 Fri, 17 Apr 2009 20:02:25 +0000 http://www.oscargamblesociety.com/mlb-overunder-for-team-wins/#comment-1650 I'll take that pounder bet, Danny - Brewers and under 86. And fuck me - I meant to type 88 games for the Mets, not 85. Oh well, 85 it is... I’ll take that pounder bet, Danny - Brewers and under 86.

And fuck me - I meant to type 88 games for the Mets, not 85. Oh well, 85 it is…

]]> by: Cliffy http://www.oscargamblesociety.com/mlb-overunder-for-team-wins/#comment-1639 Thu, 09 Apr 2009 13:43:20 +0000 http://www.oscargamblesociety.com/mlb-overunder-for-team-wins/#comment-1639 I'll take Gonzo's pounder on the Yanks - he's got over 97.5, I've got under. I'll also take Gonzo's pounder on the Mets - he's offered under 85, I'll take the over. I'll take Danny's pounder on the Braves - I've got under 83.5, Danny's got over. Anyone else? I’ll take Gonzo’s pounder on the Yanks - he’s got over 97.5, I’ve got under. I’ll also take Gonzo’s pounder on the Mets - he’s offered under 85, I’ll take the over.

I’ll take Danny’s pounder on the Braves - I’ve got under 83.5, Danny’s got over.

Anyone else?

]]> by: shtiny http://www.oscargamblesociety.com/mlb-overunder-for-team-wins/#comment-1635 Fri, 03 Apr 2009 21:51:24 +0000 http://www.oscargamblesociety.com/mlb-overunder-for-team-wins/#comment-1635 Brewers at 80 is a gift.... things do not have to go that well for them to win 86 or more. I would also take the over on ATL. They have revamped pitching and 83 seems low CIN is low. That is a very dangerous team. Volquez, Cueto, Harang, and Arroyo is a very solid staff, and they have a very nice nucleus of hitters, led by Joey Votto who will hit 40 bombs this year SF at 80? no chance... that team is terrible. You just can't win when your 3-4 hitters are rowand and one of the molina bros. yanks have a lot of stars and scrubs. they have a huge hole at 3b for the first month, and in CF, 2B, C for the whole year. Red Sox and Yanks will see what it is like when you have an auto - out at the catcher spot... very spoiled with the Captain and Posada all these years. AJ Burnett is a huge ground ball pitcher that will badly miss the best defensive infield in the majors playing behind him. So long John McDonald... hello Derek Jeter... LOL...I'll take the under on the Yanks.... I like what FLA has done, but that number seems about right... they have some holes in the rotation Brewers at 80 is a gift…. things do not have to go that well for them to win 86 or more.
I would also take the over on ATL. They have revamped pitching and 83 seems low
CIN is low. That is a very dangerous team. Volquez, Cueto, Harang, and Arroyo is a very solid staff, and they have a very nice nucleus of hitters, led by Joey Votto who will hit 40 bombs this year
SF at 80? no chance… that team is terrible. You just can’t win when your 3-4 hitters are rowand and one of the molina bros.
yanks have a lot of stars and scrubs. they have a huge hole at 3b for the first month, and in CF, 2B, C for the whole year. Red Sox and Yanks will see what it is like when you have an auto - out at the catcher spot… very spoiled with the Captain and Posada all these years. AJ Burnett is a huge ground ball pitcher that will badly miss the best defensive infield in the majors playing behind him. So long John McDonald… hello Derek Jeter… LOL…I’ll take the under on the Yanks….
I like what FLA has done, but that number seems about right… they have some holes in the rotation

]]> by: Gonzo http://www.oscargamblesociety.com/mlb-overunder-for-team-wins/#comment-1633 Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:42:03 +0000 http://www.oscargamblesociety.com/mlb-overunder-for-team-wins/#comment-1633 Giants seem high - their starting rotation is GREAT, but they will struggle to score 600+ runs. Then again, NL West is pretty mediocre, so it proabbly seems about right. Agree about FLA - actually, I think they finish at 500. And yes, I will pounder that. Mets and the under - they will not win more than 85 games. And yes, I will pounder that as well. Yanks will win 100. Yup on the pounder. No comment about the Brewers - you really see them as only a 500 team? Giants seem high - their starting rotation is GREAT, but they will struggle to score 600+ runs. Then again, NL West is pretty mediocre, so it proabbly seems about right.

Agree about FLA - actually, I think they finish at 500. And yes, I will pounder that.

Mets and the under - they will not win more than 85 games. And yes, I will pounder that as well.

Yanks will win 100. Yup on the pounder.

No comment about the Brewers - you really see them as only a 500 team?

]]>