<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.7" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SportsTalkRadio Stupidity</title>
	<link>http://www.oscargamblesociety.com/sportstalkradio-stupidity/</link>
	<description>People don't think it be like it is, but it do.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.7</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Cliffy</title>
		<link>http://www.oscargamblesociety.com/sportstalkradio-stupidity/#comment-607</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 04:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oscargamblesociety.com/sportstalkradio-stupidity/#comment-607</guid>
					<description>Let me be clear, I agree with the approach of "no trades" at the deadline in some cases - last year being a prime example.  Despite the contributions of Abreu-Lidle to the Yankees playoff run, I did not (and still do not) think the Sox should've given up prospects to get that deal done... given the givens at the time (most notably that Trot Nixon wasn't hurt until a day *after* the deadline - and the deal to the Yankees - had passed).

This year, I don't want the Sox to trade the farm for Dye or Texiera or whoever.  I do happen to think that they need a better fourth OF than Wily Mo (or Hinske).  I happen to think that Wily Mo could still very easily develop into a solid ML OF for the next ten years, if he's (finally) given the opportunity to play every day so he can learn to hit a major league breaking ball (among other things) - cuz the guy does have some skills (beginning with considerable strength, mercy when he does hit it... he usually smokes it).  For a playoff run, though, I'd prefer the Sox had a veteran bat who could more easily adapt to the part-time role, and who ideally offers better defense and more speed than Wily Mo (or Hinske).

I hear Bobby Kielty may be claimed off waivers... that's fine - but I'm not sure he's *that* much of an upgrade.  I saw Eric Wilbur on Boston.com suggest Eric Byrnes of Arizona, who would be a perfect choice in my mind... except for the fact that the D-backs are in a playoff race of their own, so I don't think they're looking to dump Byrnes (unfortunately).  I've seen Randy Winn and Dave Roberts (in a return trip) mentioned, they'd be good additions.

But back to the point - the caller's logic was that the he "didn't care about this year" so the Sox should do *nothing*... this in a year where they have a comfortable divisional lead, and seem to have most of the parts necessary for a meaningful playoff run.

I don't want them to make a panic move nor do I want them to make a move for the sake of making a move - and indeed if no viable trade is available, then the "do nothing" option is fine.  But (a) they should certainly look to do *something* (albeit minor - 4th OF, or perhaps some veteran bullpen help, if somehow had cheap), and (b) we should most definitely care about this year when a WS is entirely possible, which is not necessarily the case *every* year (even for the Yankees).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me be clear, I agree with the approach of &#8220;no trades&#8221; at the deadline in some cases - last year being a prime example.  Despite the contributions of Abreu-Lidle to the Yankees playoff run, I did not (and still do not) think the Sox should&#8217;ve given up prospects to get that deal done&#8230; given the givens at the time (most notably that Trot Nixon wasn&#8217;t hurt until a day *after* the deadline - and the deal to the Yankees - had passed).</p>
<p>This year, I don&#8217;t want the Sox to trade the farm for Dye or Texiera or whoever.  I do happen to think that they need a better fourth OF than Wily Mo (or Hinske).  I happen to think that Wily Mo could still very easily develop into a solid ML OF for the next ten years, if he&#8217;s (finally) given the opportunity to play every day so he can learn to hit a major league breaking ball (among other things) - cuz the guy does have some skills (beginning with considerable strength, mercy when he does hit it&#8230; he usually smokes it).  For a playoff run, though, I&#8217;d prefer the Sox had a veteran bat who could more easily adapt to the part-time role, and who ideally offers better defense and more speed than Wily Mo (or Hinske).</p>
<p>I hear Bobby Kielty may be claimed off waivers&#8230; that&#8217;s fine - but I&#8217;m not sure he&#8217;s *that* much of an upgrade.  I saw Eric Wilbur on Boston.com suggest Eric Byrnes of Arizona, who would be a perfect choice in my mind&#8230; except for the fact that the D-backs are in a playoff race of their own, so I don&#8217;t think they&#8217;re looking to dump Byrnes (unfortunately).  I&#8217;ve seen Randy Winn and Dave Roberts (in a return trip) mentioned, they&#8217;d be good additions.</p>
<p>But back to the point - the caller&#8217;s logic was that the he &#8220;didn&#8217;t care about this year&#8221; so the Sox should do *nothing*&#8230; this in a year where they have a comfortable divisional lead, and seem to have most of the parts necessary for a meaningful playoff run.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t want them to make a panic move nor do I want them to make a move for the sake of making a move - and indeed if no viable trade is available, then the &#8220;do nothing&#8221; option is fine.  But (a) they should certainly look to do *something* (albeit minor - 4th OF, or perhaps some veteran bullpen help, if somehow had cheap), and (b) we should most definitely care about this year when a WS is entirely possible, which is not necessarily the case *every* year (even for the Yankees).
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Gonzo</title>
		<link>http://www.oscargamblesociety.com/sportstalkradio-stupidity/#comment-593</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 23:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oscargamblesociety.com/sportstalkradio-stupidity/#comment-593</guid>
					<description>Wow.  Some of the fans up there in NE are, umm, interesting.  To say the least.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.  Some of the fans up there in NE are, umm, interesting.  To say the least.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Tank</title>
		<link>http://www.oscargamblesociety.com/sportstalkradio-stupidity/#comment-592</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 23:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oscargamblesociety.com/sportstalkradio-stupidity/#comment-592</guid>
					<description>Suggesting no trades seems like an above-average contribution from the garden-variety listener. It's certainly better than the staple suggestion that the local team should batch all of its marginal/used-up/overpriced players to trade for one or two all-stars (i.e. "I think Theo should trade Wily Mo Pena, Doug Mirabelli, and Mike Timlin for Albert Pujols.")</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Suggesting no trades seems like an above-average contribution from the garden-variety listener. It&#8217;s certainly better than the staple suggestion that the local team should batch all of its marginal/used-up/overpriced players to trade for one or two all-stars (i.e. &#8220;I think Theo should trade Wily Mo Pena, Doug Mirabelli, and Mike Timlin for Albert Pujols.&#8221;)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

