Comments on: Super Bowl deja vu http://www.oscargamblesociety.com/super-bowl-deja-vu/ People don't think it be like it is, but it do. Sun, 20 May 2012 08:49:04 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.7 by: Tank http://www.oscargamblesociety.com/super-bowl-deja-vu/#comment-1027 Wed, 06 Feb 2008 01:28:35 +0000 http://www.oscargamblesociety.com/super-bowl-deja-vu/#comment-1027 I have to admit, I thought the most likely outcome was a blowout of the Giants as well. Over the course of the season the Giants were a very erratic team, I suppose they just jelled at the right time. Manning certainly seemed to become a different QB from week 16 on. I have to admit, I thought the most likely outcome was a blowout of the Giants as well. Over the course of the season the Giants were a very erratic team, I suppose they just jelled at the right time. Manning certainly seemed to become a different QB from week 16 on.

]]> by: Cliffy http://www.oscargamblesociety.com/super-bowl-deja-vu/#comment-1022 Mon, 04 Feb 2008 03:16:09 +0000 http://www.oscargamblesociety.com/super-bowl-deja-vu/#comment-1022 So, um... Jakes (or anyone else)... um... ah... what happened? The Giants outplayed the Patriots is what happened - but why? I knew the Giants were good, but I truly felt the Pats were better. Clearly, they weren't. So, um… Jakes (or anyone else)… um… ah… what happened?

The Giants outplayed the Patriots is what happened - but why? I knew the Giants were good, but I truly felt the Pats were better. Clearly, they weren’t.

]]> by: Jakes http://www.oscargamblesociety.com/super-bowl-deja-vu/#comment-1020 Sun, 03 Feb 2008 21:31:25 +0000 http://www.oscargamblesociety.com/super-bowl-deja-vu/#comment-1020 I agree. Pats cover. I'll take whatever pounders are available on the other side. I agree. Pats cover. I’ll take whatever pounders are available on the other side.

]]>